Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-xdcjr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-14T06:41:57.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 21 - Preterm Pre-labour Rupture of Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2025

Sir Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Preterm pre-labour rupture of membranes (pPROM) is the spontaneous rupture of fetal membranes at least an hour prior to the onset of labour, in a viable fetus (>23 weeks), and before 37 completed weeks of gestation. It complicates 2–3% of all pregnancies, thus affecting some 14 000 pregnancies in the UK and 140 000 in the US each year. pPROM accounts for 30–40% of preterm births and is an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity and mortality from prematurity, neonatal, sepsis and pulmonary hypoplasia. Infants born after prolonged periods of pPROM have an excess risk of long-term neurological deficits and pulmonary disease. Subclinical intrauterine infection is a major etiological factor in the pathogenesis of pPROM. Studies of transabdominal amniocentesis following pPROM show that the frequency of positive culture for infection of the amniotic fluid is 25–40%. The risk of a positive culture is inversely related to the gestational age at which pPROM occurred. Women with intrauterine infection have shorter latency than non-infected women, and infants born with sepsis have a four-fold increase in mortality compared to infants born without sepsis.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cotton, DB, Hill, LM, Strassner, HT, Platt, LD, Ledger, WJ. Use of amniocentesis in preterm gestation with ruptured membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63:3843.Google ScholarPubMed
Mercer, BM, Goldenberg, RL, Moawad, AH, et al. The preterm prediction study: effect of gestational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1216–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGregor, JA, Schoonmaker, JN, Lunt, BD, Lawellin, DW. Antibiotic inhibition of bacterially induced fetal membrane weakening. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:124–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Parry, S, Strauss, JF III. Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:663–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant-Greenwood, GD, Millar, LK. Human fetal membranes: their preterm premature rupture. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:1575–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooperstock, MS, Tummaru, R, Bakewell, J, Schramm, W. Twin birth weight discordance and risk of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:63–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortunato, SJ, Menon, R, Bryant, C, Lombardi, SJ. Programmed cell death (apoptosis) as a possible pathway to metalloproteinase activation and fetal membrane degradation in premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1468–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortunato, SJ, Menon, R, Lombardi, SJ. MMP/TIMP imbalance in amniotic fluid during PROM: an indirect support for endogenous pathway to membrane rupture. J Perinat Med. 1999;27:362–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, BM, Sowell, A, Gunter, E, Wang, M. Potential role of ascorbic acid and beta-carotene in the prevention of preterm rupture of fetal membranes. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1994;64:192–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Barrett, B, Gunter, E, Jenkins, J, Wang, M. Ascorbic acid concentration in amniotic fluid in late pregnancy. Biol Neonate. 1991;60:333–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, ML, McElin, TW. Diagnosis of ruptured fetal membranes: clinical study and review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;104:544–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palacio, M, Kuhnert, M, Berger, R, Larios, CL, Marcellin, L. Meta-analysis of studies on biochemical marker tests for the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes: comparison of performance indexes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Igbinosa, I, Moore, FA 3rd, Johnson, C, Block, JE. Comparison of rapid immunoassays for rupture of fetal membranes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Preterm labour and birth (NICE Guideline NG25). 2015 20 Nov [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25Google Scholar
Carroll, SG, Papaioannou, S, Nicolaides, KH. Assessment of fetal activity and amniotic fluid volume in the prediction of intrauterine infection in preterm prelabor amniorrhexis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;175:1427–35.Google Scholar
Alexander, JM, Mercer, BM, Miodovnik, M, et al. The impact of digital cervical examination on expectantly managed preterm rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1003–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, DF, Major, CA, Towers, CV, et al. Effects of digital vaginal examinations on latency period in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:630–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Romero, R, Sirtori, M, Oyarzun, E, et al. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:817–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Felice, C, Toti, P, Laurini, RN, et al. Early neonatal brain injury in histologic chorioamnionitis. J Pediatr. 2001;138:101–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, SG, Papaioannou, S, Nicolaides, KH. Doppler studies of the placental and fetal circulation in pregnancies with preterm prelabor amniorrhexis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5:184–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, DF, Adair, CD, Weeks, JW, et al. A randomized clinical trial of daily nonstress testing versus biophysical profile in the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1495–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, AJ, on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Care of women presenting with suspected preterm prelabour rupture of membranes from 24+0 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2019;126:e152–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naef, RW III, Allbert, JR, Ross, EL, et al. Premature rupture of membranes at 34 to 37 weeks’ gestation: aggressive versus conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:126–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grable, IA. Cost-effectiveness of induction after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1153–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escobar, GJ, Clark, RH, Greene, JD. Short-term outcomes of infants born at 35 and 36 weeks’ gestation: we need to ask more questions. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30:2833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khashu, M, Narayanan, M, Bhargava, S, Osiovich, H. Perinatal outcomes associated with preterm birth at 33 to 36 weeks’ gestation: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics. 2009;123:109–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitsommart, R, Janes, M, Mahajan, V, et al. Outcomes of late-preterm infants: a retrospective, single-center, Canadian study. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009;48:844–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenyon, S, Boulvain, M, Neilson, JP. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD001058.Google Scholar
Kenyon, S, Pike, K, Jones, DR, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE II trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1319–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Kenyon, SL, Taylor, DJ, Tarnow-Mordi, W. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE I randomised trial. ORACLE Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2001;357:979–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Hannah, M. Antibiotics for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and preterm labour? Lancet. 2001;357:973–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, SD, Foxman, B, Pierson, CL, et al. Correlates of antibiotic-resistant group B streptococcus isolated from pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:74–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Manning, SD, Pearlman, MD, Tallman, P, Pierson, CL, Foxman, B. Frequency of antibiotic resistance among group B Streptococcus isolated from healthy college students. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:E137–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearlman, MD, Pierson, CL, Faix, RG. Frequent resistance of clinical group B streptococci isolates to clindamycin and erythromycin. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:258–61.Google Scholar
Murch, SH. Toll of allergy reduced by probiotics. Lancet. 2001;375:1057–9.Google Scholar
How, HY, Cook, VD, Miles, DE, Spinnato, JA. Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: aggressive tocolysis versus expectant management. J Mat Fetal Med. 1998;7:812.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, DL, Warsof, SL. Oral ritodrine and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66:621–3.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Renk, K, Klugman, M. The therapeutic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of aggressive tocolysis for premature labor associated with premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:216–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garite, TJ, Keegan, KA, Freeman, RK, Nageotte, MP. A randomized trial of ritodrine tocolysis versus expectant management in patients with premature rupture of membranes at 25 to 30 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:388–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combs, CA, McCune, M, Clark, R, Fishman, A. Aggressive tocolysis does not prolong pregnancy or reduce neonatal morbidity after preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1723–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Been, JV, Degraeuwe, PL, Kramer, BW, Zimmermann, LJ. Antenatal steroids and neonatal outcome after chorioamnionitis: a meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011;118:113–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magann, EF, Haram, K, Ounpraseuth, S, Mortensen, JH, Spencer, HJ, Morrison, JC. Use of corticosteroids in special circumstances: a comprehensive review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:395409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regan, JA, Klebanoff, MA, Nugent, RP. The epidemiology of group B streptococcal colonization in pregnancy: Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:604–10.Google Scholar
Hughes, RG, Brocklehurst, P, Steer, PJ, Heath, P, Stenson, BM on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. Green-top Guideline No. 36. BJOG. 2017;124:e280e305.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 120: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(6): 1472–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, R, Romero, R, Nien, JK, et al. Antibiotic administration to patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes does not eradicate intraamniotic infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:167–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, A, Sommer, E, Cichna, M, et al. Placental passage of clarithromycin surpasses other macrolide antibiotics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:816–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heikkinen, T, Laine, K, Neuvonen, PJ, Ekblad, U. The transplacental transfer of the macrolide antibiotics erythromycin, roxithromycin and azithromycin. BJOG. 2000;107:770–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fidel, P, Ghezzi, F, Romero, R, et al. The effect of antibiotic therapy on intrauterine infection-induced preterm parturition in rabbits. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;14:5764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ugwumadu, A, Reid, F, Hay, P, Manyonda, I, Jeffrey, I. Oral clindamycin and histologic chorioamnionitis in women with abnormal vaginal flora. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:863–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, RL, Mwatha, A, Read, JS, et al. The HPTN 024 Study: the efficacy of antibiotics to prevent chorioamnionitis and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:650–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×