Book contents
- Best Practice in Labour and Delivery
- Reviews
- Best Practice in Labour and Delivery
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface to the Third Edition
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Pelvic and Fetal Cranial Anatomy and the Stages and Mechanism of Labour
- Chapter 2 The First Stage of Labour
- Chapter 3 Analgesia and Anaesthesia in Labour and Delivery
- Chapter 4 Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring
- Chapter 5 Uterine Contractions
- Chapter 6 Identification and Management of Presumed Intrapartum Fetal Distress
- Chapter 7 Prolonged Second Stage of Labour Including Difficult Decision-Making on Assisted Vaginal Birth and Caesarean Birth
- Chapter 8 Instrumental Vaginal Deliveries
- Chapter 9 Vaginal Breech Deliveries and External Cephalic Version
- Chapter 10 The Evidence-Based Caesarean Delivery Technique
- Chapter 11 Shoulder Dystocia
- Chapter 12 Umbilical Cord Prolapse
- Chapter 13 Twin Delivery
- Chapter 14 Antepartum Haemorrhage
- Chapter 15 Management of the Third Stage of Labour
- Chapter 16 Postpartum Haemorrhage
- Chapter 17 Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum
- Chapter 18 Acute Illness and Maternal Collapse
- Chapter 19 Episiotomy and Obstetric Perineal Trauma
- Chapter 20 Induction of Labour
- Chapter 21 Preterm Pre-labour Rupture of Membranes
- Chapter 22 Preterm Birth
- Chapter 23 Labour in Women with Medical Disorders
- Chapter 24 Management of Women with Previous Caesarean Section
- Chapter 25 Hypertensive Disorders in Labour and Delivery
- Chapter 26 Rupture of the Uterus
- Chapter 27 Neonatal Resuscitation and the Management of Immediate Neonatal Problems
- Chapter 28 The Immediate Puerperium
- Chapter 29 Triage and Prioritisation on Labour Wards
- Chapter 30 Maternity Training in the Twenty-First Century
- Chapter 31 Risk Management in Intrapartum Care
- Chapter 32 Cerebral Palsy Arising from Events in Labour
- Chapter 33 Non-technical Skills to Improve Obstetric Practice
- Index
- References
Chapter 30 - Maternity Training in the Twenty-First Century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 October 2025
Book contents
- Best Practice in Labour and Delivery
- Reviews
- Best Practice in Labour and Delivery
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface to the Third Edition
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Pelvic and Fetal Cranial Anatomy and the Stages and Mechanism of Labour
- Chapter 2 The First Stage of Labour
- Chapter 3 Analgesia and Anaesthesia in Labour and Delivery
- Chapter 4 Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring
- Chapter 5 Uterine Contractions
- Chapter 6 Identification and Management of Presumed Intrapartum Fetal Distress
- Chapter 7 Prolonged Second Stage of Labour Including Difficult Decision-Making on Assisted Vaginal Birth and Caesarean Birth
- Chapter 8 Instrumental Vaginal Deliveries
- Chapter 9 Vaginal Breech Deliveries and External Cephalic Version
- Chapter 10 The Evidence-Based Caesarean Delivery Technique
- Chapter 11 Shoulder Dystocia
- Chapter 12 Umbilical Cord Prolapse
- Chapter 13 Twin Delivery
- Chapter 14 Antepartum Haemorrhage
- Chapter 15 Management of the Third Stage of Labour
- Chapter 16 Postpartum Haemorrhage
- Chapter 17 Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum
- Chapter 18 Acute Illness and Maternal Collapse
- Chapter 19 Episiotomy and Obstetric Perineal Trauma
- Chapter 20 Induction of Labour
- Chapter 21 Preterm Pre-labour Rupture of Membranes
- Chapter 22 Preterm Birth
- Chapter 23 Labour in Women with Medical Disorders
- Chapter 24 Management of Women with Previous Caesarean Section
- Chapter 25 Hypertensive Disorders in Labour and Delivery
- Chapter 26 Rupture of the Uterus
- Chapter 27 Neonatal Resuscitation and the Management of Immediate Neonatal Problems
- Chapter 28 The Immediate Puerperium
- Chapter 29 Triage and Prioritisation on Labour Wards
- Chapter 30 Maternity Training in the Twenty-First Century
- Chapter 31 Risk Management in Intrapartum Care
- Chapter 32 Cerebral Palsy Arising from Events in Labour
- Chapter 33 Non-technical Skills to Improve Obstetric Practice
- Index
- References
Summary
Obstetric emergencies are frequently encountered on labour wards and in maternity units across the world. To manage these emergencies safely, a maternity team is required to demonstrate excellent collaboration to care for mothers, birthing people and babies in challenging circumstances. Such skills can be learnt and developed through simulation training. Yet, improvements in team working, and the need to transform the working culture of maternity organisations have been recurrently recommended following several high-profile inquiries and national reviews of care (Saving Babies’ Lives Version Three 2023, Ockenden Report 2022, Kirkup Report 2015). In this chapter, we explore the benefits of maternity training, and consider how to establish and ensure the success of a training programme. We reflect on the limitations of current simulation training in the UK, then look ahead to an exciting future of innovation in the field which aims to make birth safer for mothers, birthing people and babies globally.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Best Practice in Labour and Delivery , pp. 379 - 391Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Dillon, S. Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology: a review of the past, present and future. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48(4):689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayub, S. ‘See one, do one, teach one’: balancing patient care and surgical training in an emergency trauma department. J Glob Health. 2022;12:03051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogh, S, Thellesen, L, Bergholt, T, Rom, AL, Johansen, M, Sorensen, JL. How often will midwives and obstetricians experience obstetric emergencies or high-risk deliveries: a national cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MBRRACE-UK. Maternal mortality 2020–2022. 2024 [cited 2024 23 Apr]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/y6a6enmyGoogle Scholar
Rimmer, A. Maternal death rate in the UK rises to highest in 20 years. BMJ. 2024;384.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, J, Beck, S, Ayers, N, et al. Improving teamwork in maternity services: a rapid review of interventions. Midwifery. 2022;108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesinioti, P, Angouri, J, O’Brien, S, Bristowe, K, Siassakos, D. ‘Get me the airway there’: negotiating leadership in obstetric emergencies. Discourse Comm. 2019;14(2).Google Scholar
Kirkup, B. The report of the Morecambe Bay investigation [Kirkup report]. 2015 Mar [cited 2024 23 Apr]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/2skspyr8Google Scholar
Ockenden, D. Independent review of maternity services [Ockenden report]. 2022 30 Mar [cited 2024 23 Apr]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/4wahe3m6Google Scholar
Van Tetering, AAC, Ntuyo, P, Martens, RPJ, et al. Simulation-based training in emergency obstetric care in Sub-Saharan and Central Africa: a scoping review. Annals of Global Health. 2023;89(1):62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limbs & Things. Birth Simulator PROMPT Flex – Advanced (light skin tone). 2024 [cited 2024 23 Apr]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/ymyzjfmaGoogle Scholar
Banke-Thomas, A, Wilson-Jones, M, Madaj, B, van den Broeke, N. Economic evaluation of emergency obstetric care training: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neuhaus, C, Lutnaes, DE, Bergstrom, J. Emergence of power and complexity in obstetric teamwork. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(6):e0269711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Team of the shift. 2024 [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/58m6hxbyGoogle Scholar
Janssens, S, Kikkawa, Y, Martin, TJ. How do maternity teams perform in and perceive a role-based approach to teamwork in maternity emergencies? A qualitative study in simulation. Int J Healthcare Simul. 2023:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssens, S, Simon, R, Barwick, S, Beckmann, M, Marshall, S. Leadership sharing in maternity emergency teams: a retrospective cohort study in simulation. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020;6(3):135–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssens, S, Clipperton, S, Simon, R, Lowe, B, Beckmann, M, Marshall, S. Clinicians’ attitudes towards a co-leadership structure for maternity emergency teams: an interview study. J Interprof Care. 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Shared decision making (NICE Guideline NG197). 2021 17 Jun [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197/evidenceGoogle Scholar
Lippke, S, Wienert, J, Keller, FM, et al. Communication and patient safety in gynecology and obstetrics – study protocol of an intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, W, Peng, F-S, Lin, H-H, Hsiao, S-M. The impact of situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) on safety attitudes in the obstetrics department. Taiwan J Obstet and Gynecol. 2017;56(2):171–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trauma and Victoria. Teamwork and communication. 2023 [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/43mxc5t3Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Advice, Inform, Do (AID). 2024 [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/29a6x35kGoogle Scholar
Dyer, C. Failure to work collaboratively and learn from incidents led to deaths of babies and mothers at Shrewsbury and Telford trust, review finds. BMJ. 2022;376.Google Scholar
Truong, S, Foley, OW, Fallah, P, et al. Transcending language barriers in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;142(4):809–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panko, TL, Cuculick, J, Albert, S, et al. Experiences of pregnancy and perinatal healthcare access of women who are deaf: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2022;130(5):514–21.Google Scholar
Garner, J, Murray, S, Parisaei, M. Prioritisation on labour ward. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2019;29(10):292–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunford, D, Hamilton, S. How delivery suite co-ordinators create situational awareness in the multidisciplinary team. BJM. 2019;27(8).Google Scholar
Health Services Safety Investigation Branch. Investigation report: delays to intrapartum investigation once fetal compromise is suspected. 2020 20 Nov [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/bddhnckuGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Each Baby Counts: key messages from 2015. 2016 Jun [cited 2024 23 Apr]. Available from: www.rcog.org.uk/media/a4nligis/each-baby-counts-key-messages-2015-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Young, P, MacLennan, K. Human factors in obstetrics. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2019;20(9):506–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, JA, Lutgendorf, MA, Ennen, CS, et al. Obstetric simulation training and teamwork: immediate impact on knowledge, teamwork, and adherence to hemorrhage protocols. Simul Healthc. 2023;18(1):32–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz-Navarro, C, Armstrong, R, Charnetski, M, et al. Global consensus statement on simulation-based practice in healthcare. Adv Simul (Lond). 2024;9(1):19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sansregret, A, Garber, A, Freire-Lizama, T, et al. Consensus statement no. 43: simulation in obstetrics and gynaecology. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2023;45(3):214–26.e1.Google Scholar
Alalade, AO, Sekar, S. Simulation-based education for enhancing obstetric emergency response: a needs impact evaluation. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43908.Google ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Sturrock, S, Wallace, EM, et al. Evaluation of learning from Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training and its impact on patient outcomes in Australia using Kirkpatrick’s framework: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e017451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training. Maternal outcomes. 2024 [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: www.promptmaternity.org/maternal-outcomesGoogle Scholar
PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training. Fetal outcomes. 2024 [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: www.promptmaternity.org/fetal-outcomesGoogle Scholar
Le Lous, M, Simon, O, Lassel, L, Lavoue, V, Jannin, P. Hybrid simulation for obstetric training: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;246:23–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Ven, J, Van Baaren, GJ, Fransen, AF, Van Runnard Heimel, J, Mol, BW, Oei, SG. Cost-effectiveness of simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies (TOTSI study). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:130–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training. Financial impact. 2024. [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: www.promptmaternity.org/financial-impactGoogle Scholar
Care Quality Commission. Safety, equity and engagement in maternity services. 2022 12 May [cited 2024 20 Mar]. Available from: www.cqc.org.uk/publications/themes-care/safety-equity-engagement-maternity-servicesGoogle Scholar
Davies, E, Montagu, A, Brazil, V. Recommendations for embedding simulation in health services. Adv Sim. 2023;8(1):23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Matrix of progression 2023–2024. 2023 [cited 2024 21 Mar]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/4u9kjamzGoogle Scholar
Eppich, W, Cheng, A. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(2):106–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fegran, L, ten Ham-Baloyi, W, Fossum, M, et al. Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: a scoping review. Nurs Open. 2023;10(3):1217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schober, P, Kistemaker, KRJ, Sijani, F, Schwarte, LA, van Groeningen, D, Krage, R. Effects of post-scenario debriefing versus stop-and-go debriefing in medical simulation training on skill acquisition and learning experience: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick Partners. The Kirkpatrick model. 2024 [cited 2024 21 Mar]. Available from: www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/the-kirkpatrick-modelGoogle Scholar
Gorantla, S, Bansal, U, Singh, JV, Dwivedi, AD, Malhotra, A, Kumar, A. Introduction of an undergraduate interprofessional simulation based skills training program in obstetrics and gynaecology in India. Adv Simul. 2019;4:6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huwendiek, S, De Leng, BA, Kononowicz, AA, et al. Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating virtual patient design with a special emphasis on fostering clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 2015;37(8):775–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shinohara, M, Nakamura, T, Kunikata, N, Okudera, H, Kuroda, Y. A half-day stroke workshop based on the Kirkpatrick model to improve new clinical staff behavior. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020;8(1):10–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Tempest, N, Navaratnam, K, Hapangama, DK. Management of delivery when malposition of the fetal head complicates the second stage of labour. Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;17(4):273–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, D, Atere-Roberts, N, Williams, A, Oteng-Ntim, E, Chappell, LC. Obstetric anal sphincter injury. BMJ. 2010;341:c3414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UKARCOG. ReDEFINe (Rotational DElivery at Full dIlatatioN). 2018 [cited 2024 23 Apr]. Available from: http://ukarcog.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ReDEFINe-facts-and-figures-poster.pdfGoogle Scholar
Youssef, A, Ghi, T, Pilu, G. How to perform ultrasound in labor: assessment of fetal occiput position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(4):476–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaufuraully, S, Fernandez Salvadores, C, Bagchi, B, et al. Detection of anal sphincter injury using a sensorised surgical glove [Conference presentation abstract]. British Intrapartum Care Society Conference 2022 [cited 2024 14 Mar]. London. Available from: https://bicsoc.org.uk/bics-conference-22Google Scholar
Jaufuraully, S, Salvadores Fernandez, C, Bagchi, B, et al. Preventing stillbirth from obstructed labor: a sensorized, low-cost device to train in safer operative birth. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health. 2023;3:1039477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.