Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-9f75d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-09T04:02:26.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 19 - Episiotomy and Obstetric Perineal Trauma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2025

Sir Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Eighty-five per cent of women sustain perineal trauma during vaginal birth. This may occur spontaneously or intentionally when a surgical incision (episiotomy) is made. The overall risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) is approximately 2% of all vaginal deliveries. The morbidity associated with perineal trauma depends on the extent of injury, the suturing technique and materials, and the skill of the person performing the procedure. Therefore, it is important that focused and intensive training is available and that practitioners ensure that procedures, such as perineal repair, are evidence-based in order to provide care that is effective, appropriate and cost-efficient. In the UK, between 2000 and 2012, the OASIs rate in England tripled from 1.8% to 5.9%, suggesting that preventive measures need to be put in place. In this chapter, we highlight safe obstetric practice and preventative strategies based on the best available evidence to minimise perineal and anal sphincter trauma.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

McCandlish, R, Bowler, U, Asten, H, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. BJOG. 1998;105(12):1262–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, ID, Carroli, G, Davies, C, Medves, JM. Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth. 2005;32(3):219223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurol-Urganci, I, Cromwell, D, Edozien, L, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sultan, AH, Kamm, MA, Hudson, CN, Thomas, JM, Bartram, CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. New Engl J Med. 1993;329(26):1905–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sultan, AH, Thakar, R. Diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). In: Sultan, AH, Thakar, R, Lewicky-Gaupp, C, editors. Pelvic floor, perineal, and anal sphincter trauma during childbirth: diagnosis, management and prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024: pp. 3748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, management (Green-top Guideline No. 29). 2015 Jun [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: https://rb.gy/t5fzknGoogle Scholar
Okeahialam, NA, Draycott, TJ, Thakar, R. Prevention of perineal trauma. In: Sultan, AH, Thakar, R, Lewicky-Gaupp, C, editors. Pelvic floor, perineal, and anal sphincter trauma during childbirth: diagnosis, management and prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024: pp. 191208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakar, R, Fenner, DE, Hong, CX. Anatomy of the pelvic floor, perineum and anal sphincter. In: Sultan, AH, Thakar, R, Lewicky-Gaupp, C, editors. Pelvic floor, perineal, and anal sphincter trauma during childbirth: diagnosis, management and prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024: pp. 116.Google Scholar
Kearney, R, Sawhney, R, DeLancey, JOL. Levator ani muscle anatomy evaluated by origin-insertion pairs. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):168–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, MD, Bremer, RE, Thor, KB, Dolber, PC, Kuehl, TJ, Coates, KW. Innervation of the female levator ani muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):6471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okeahialam, NA, Taithongchai, A, Thakar, R, Sultan, AH. The incidence of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) graded using the Sultan classification: a network meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;228(6):675–88.Google Scholar
Okeahialam, NA, Taithongchai, A, Thakar, R, Sultan, AH. Corrigendum to ‘The incidence of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury graded using the Sultan classification: a network meta-analysis’ [American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 228/6 (2023) 675–688]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230(5):581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, JC, Thakar, R, Sultan, AH. Isolated rectal buttonhole tears in obstetrics: case series and review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1761–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Kalis, V, Laine, K, de Leeuw, J, Ismail, K, Tincello, D. Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology: international classification of episiotomy. BJOG. 2012;119(5):522–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroli, G, Mignini, L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD000081.Google Scholar
Okeahialam, NA, Wong, KW, Jha, S, Sultan, AH, Thakar, R. Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(6):13931405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karbanova, J, Rusavy, Z, Betincova, L, Jansova, M, Parizek, A, Kalis, V. Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(1):72–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalis, V, Landsmanova, J, Bednarova, B, Karbanova, J, Laine, K, Rokyta, Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112(3):220–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care (NICE Guideline NG235). 2023 29 Sep [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng235Google Scholar
Kalis, V, Karbanova, J, Horak, M, Lobovsky, L, Kralickova, M, Rokyta, Z. The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;103(1):58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, D, Strachan, B, Bahl, R, Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Assisted vaginal birth: Green‐top Guideline No. 26. BJOG. 2020;127(9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, JC, Amber, N, Wan, OYK, Sultan, AH, Thakar, R. Review of available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(11):2247–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, A, Nassar, AH, Visser, G, Ramasauskaite, D, Theron, G, for the FIGO Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee. FIGO good clinical practice paper: management of the second stage of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152(2):172–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, H, Qian, X, Carroli, G, Garner, P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081.Google ScholarPubMed
Sagi-Dain, L, Kreinin-Bleicher, I, Bahous, R, et al. Is it time to abandon episiotomy use? A randomized controlled trial (EPITRIAL). Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(11):2377–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Murphy, D, Macleod, M, Bahl, R, Goyder, K, Howarth, L, Strachan, B. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study. BJOG. 2008;115(13):16951703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kettle, C, Dowswell, T, Ismail, KM. Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD000947.Google ScholarPubMed
Webb, S, Thakar, R. Episiotomy, first and second degree tears. In: Sultan, AH, Thakar, R, Lewicky-Gaupp, C, editors. Pelvic floor, perineal, and anal sphincter trauma during childbirth: diagnosis, management and prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024: pp. 4960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sultan, AH, Thakar, R. Management of acute obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). In: Sultan, AH, Thakar, R, Lewicky-Gaupp, C, editors. Pelvic floor, perineal, and anal sphincter trauma during childbirth: diagnosis, management and prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024: pp. 6188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, E, Markham, C, Ryder, I, Kettle, C. Labial trauma post birth: a delphi study of classification and suturing requirements. Midwifery. 2019;71:4955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okeahialam, NA, Thakar, R, Sultan, AH. Perineal and anal sphincter wound healing complications. In: Sultan, AH, Thakar, R, Lewicky-Gaupp, C, editors. Pelvic floor, perineal, and anal sphincter trauma during childbirth: diagnosis, management and prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024: pp. 135–60.Google Scholar
Kettle, C, Dowswell, T, Ismail, KM. Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6:CD000006.Google Scholar
Fernando, R, Sultan, A, Kettle, C, Thakar, R. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD002866.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, L, Mandelbrot, L, Bourgeois Moine, A, et al. Caesarean section in the second delivery to prevent anal incontinence after asymptomatic obstetric anal sphincter injury: the EPIC multicentre randomised trial. BJOG. 2021;28(4):685–93.Google Scholar
Fehlmann, A, Reichetzer, B, Ouellet, S, Tremblay, C, Clermont, M-E. Establishing a peripartum perineal trauma clinic: a narrative review. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1653–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheer, I, Thakar, R, Sultan, AH. Mode of delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)—a reappraisal? Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20(9):10951101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okeahialam, NA, Thakar, R, Sultan, AH. Effect of a subsequent pregnancy on anal sphincter integrity and function after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Int Urogynecol J. 2020;32(7):1719–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Okeahialam, NA, Thakar, R, Naidu, M, Sultan, AH. Outcome of anal symptoms and anorectal function following two obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) – a nested case-controlled study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(11):2405–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Souza, JC, Monga, A, Tincello, DG, et al. Maternal outcomes in subsequent delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): a multi-centre retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):627–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sideris, M, McCaughey, T, Hanrahan, JG, et al. Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries OASIS) and anal incontinence: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:303–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHS Litigation Authority. Ten years of maternity claims: an analysis of NHS Litigation Authority data. 2012 [cited 2024 14 Mar]. Available from: https://rb.gy/ff1ukwGoogle Scholar
Roper, JC, Thakar, R, Sultan, AH. Education and training in OASIS. In: Sultan, AH, Thakar, R, Lewicky-Gaupp, C, editors. Pelvic floor, perineal, and anal sphincter trauma during childbirth: diagnosis, management and prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024: pp. 389401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okeahialam, NA, Sultan, AH, Thakar, R. The prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;230(3S):S991S1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jurczuk, M, Bidwell, P, Gurol-Urganci, I, et al. The OASI care bundle quality improvement project: lessons learned and future direction. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1989–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×