Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) (2017).Google Scholar

Ashgar Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan, case no. 25501/2015, Lahore High Court, Order of 4 September 2015.Google Scholar

Atapattu, S. (2021). Global South Approaches. In Rajamani, L. & Peel, J., eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183–99.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (2017). The Role of the International Court of Justice in Addressing Climate Change: Some Preliminary Reflections. Arizona State Law Journal, 49, 689–712.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (2023). Advisory Opinions on Climate Change: Some Preliminary Questions. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 32, 185–92.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. & O’Connor, S. D. (2022). An ICJ Advisory Opinion on Climate Change: Ten Questions and Answers, Arlington, VA: Centre for Climate and Energy Solutions.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. & Rajamani, L. (2017). International Climate Change Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogdandy, A. von & Venzke, I. (2014). In Whose Name? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brent, K. A. (2017). The Certain Activities Case: What Implications for the No-Harm Rule? Asia-Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 20, 28–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brundtland Commission (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica Along the Santa Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica), Judgment, ICJ Reports (2015), 665 (‘Certain Activities Case’).Google Scholar

Chinkin, C. & Mackenzie, R. (2002). Intergovernmental Organisations as ‘Friends of the Court’. In Boisson de Chazoures, L., Romano, C. & Mackenzie, R., eds., International Organisations and International Dispute Settlement, Trends and Prospects. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 135–64.Google Scholar

Community Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) Judgment (merits), 31 August 2001.Google Scholar

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (1989) (adopted 20 November 1989; entered into force 2 September 1990), 1577 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Demanda Generaciones Futuras v Minambiente (Future Generations v. Ministry of the environment and others) 2018 STC4360-2018, Supreme Court of Columbia (2018). English translation available at: www.dejusticia.org/en/climate-change-and-future-generations-lawsuit-in-colombia-key-excerpts-from-the-supreme-courts-decision/.Google Scholar

Duarte Agostinho and Others v Portugal and 32 others, App no. 39371/20 (9 April 2024) European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).Google Scholar

Dupuy, P.-M. & Viñuales, J. E. (2018). International Environmental Law, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duvic-Paoli, L.-A. & Gervasi, M. (2022). Harm to the Global Commons on Trial: The Role of the Prevention Principle International Climate Adjudication. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 32(2), 226–36.Google Scholar

Edenhofer, O., Wallacher, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Reder, M., Knopf, B., & Müller, J. eds. (2012). Climate Change, Justice and Sustainability: Linking Climate and Development, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia), Judgment, ICJ Reports (1997), 7.Google Scholar

Gaja, G. (2020). General Principles of Law. In Peters, A. & Wolfrum, R., eds., Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar

Goa Foundation v. Union of India & Ors, Writ Petition (Civil) no. 435 of 2012, Supreme Court of India (2014), Judgment (21 April 2014).Google Scholar

Ground International Work Trust & Vukani Environmental Justice Alliance Movement in Action v Minister of Environmental Affairs & Others, Case no. 39724/2019, High Court of South Africa, [2022] ZAGPPHC 208 (2022).Google Scholar

Held v Montana, CDV-2020-307, Montana First Judicial District Court Lewis and Clark County (2023), decision of 14 August 2023. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/wp-content/uploads/case-documents/2023/20230814_docket-CDV-2020-307order.pdf.Google Scholar

Humphreys, S. (2022). Against Future Generations. European Journal of International Law, 33(4), 1061–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

In re Court on Its Own Motion v State of Himachal Pradesh, National Green Tribunal Delhi (2016), Decision of 9 May 2016.Google Scholar

Indigenous Community Sawhoyamaxa, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) Judgment (merits), 29 March 2006.Google Scholar

Indigenous Community Yakye Axa, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) Judgment (merits), 6 February 2006.Google Scholar

InfluenceMap. (2020). Australian Industry Associations and Their Carbon Policy Footprint, an Influence Map Report. Available at: https://influencemap.org/report/Australian-Industry-Groups-And-their-Carbon-Policy-Footprint-c0f1578c92f9c6782614da1b5a5ce94f.Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Summary for Policymakers. In Core Writing Team, Lee, H. and Romero, J., eds., Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 1–34, https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.00.Google Scholar

International Law Association (ILA). (2002). New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law Relating to Sustainable Development, Resolution 3/2002. Available at: www.ila-hq.org/en_GB/documents/conference-resolution-english-new-delhi-2002-3.Google Scholar

International Law Association (ILA). (2014). Washington Conference: Legal Principles Relating to Climate Change, Rajamani L. et al. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2461556.Google Scholar

International Law Commission (ILC). (2001). Draft Articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities. With Commentaries. In Yearbook of The International Law Commission, Vol. II Part Two, New York/Geneva: ILC.Google Scholar

Jones, M. W., Peters, G. P., & Gasser, T. et al. (2023). National Contributions to Climate Change Due to Historical Emissions of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Since 1850. Scientific Data, 10, article 155, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02041-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Khan, M. I. (2022). Statement on Behalf of the Group of 77 and China by Mr Muhammad Imran Khan, Counsellor, Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations, at the Informal Consultations on the Draft Elements Paper on the ‘Declaration for Future Generations’ (New York, 7 September 2022). Available at: www.g77.org/statement/getstatement.php?id=220907.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. (2014). Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, P. (2022). Justifying Representation of Future Generations and Nature: Contradictory or Mutually Supporting Values? Transnational Environmental Law, 11, 553–79.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. (2024). The International Court of Justice (ICJ) Advisory Opinion on Climate Change and Future Generations. Practice Note. Chinese Journal of Environmental Law, 8, 284–300.10.1163/24686042-12340127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, P. & Köhler, L. (2018). Representation of Future Generations through International Climate Litigation: A Normative Framework. German Yearbook of International Law, 60, 639–66.10.3790/gyil.60.1.639CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion, Judgment, ICJ Reports (1996) ICJ 3 (‘Legality of Nuclear Weapons’).Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Advisory Opinions. ICJ Reports (1996), 429 (‘Legality of Nuclear Weapons’), Separate Opinion of Justice Weeramantry.Google Scholar

Letsas, G. (2024). Did the Court in Klimaseniorinnen create an actio popularis? European Journal of International Law: Talk! (Blog, 13 May 2024). Available at: www.ejiltalk.org/did-the-court-in-klimaseniorinnen-create-an-actio-popularis/.Google Scholar

Maastricht Principles on the Human Rights of Future Generations (2023). Available at: www.rightsoffuturegenerations.org/.Google Scholar

Mayer, B. (2023). International Advisory Proceedings on Climate Change. Michigan Journal of International Law, 44(41), 41–115.Google Scholar

Nedeski, N., Sparks, T. & Hernández, G. (2023). The World is Burning, Urgently and Irreparably – A Plea for Interim Protection against Climatic Change at the ICJ. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 22(2), 301–37. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-bja10095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neubauer et al., Case No. BvR 2656/18/1, BvR 78/20/1, BvR 96/20/1, BvR 288/20. Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [Federal Constitutional Court] (2021). English translation available at: https://climatecasechart.com/wp-content/uploads/non-us-case-documents/2021/20210324_11817_order-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Nolan, A. (2023). General Comment No. 26 on Children and the Environment – A Milestone in International Human Rights Law? European Journal of International Law: Talk! (Blog, 13 September 2023). Available at: www.ejiltalk.org/general-comment-no-26-on-children-and-the-environment-a-milestone-in-international-human-rights-law.Google Scholar

Nolan, A. (2024). Inter-generational Equity, Future Generations and Democracy in the European Court of Human Rights’ Klimaseniorinnen Decision, European Journal of International Law: Talk! (Blog, 5 April 2024). Available at: www.ejiltalk.org/inter-generational-equity-future-generations-and-democracy-in-the-european-court-of-human-rights-klimaseniorinnen-decision/.Google Scholar

North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany v. Denmark; Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment, ICJ Reports (1969), 3.Google Scholar

Nuclear Tests Case (New Zealand v France), Judgement, ICJ Reports (1974) 317.Google Scholar

Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change (Request for Advisory Opinion), Order of 20 April 2023.Google Scholar

Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change (2024). Our Journey. Available at: www.pisfcc.org/ourjourney.Google Scholar

Paris Agreement (2015) (adopted 12 December 2015; entered into force 4 November 2016) 3156 UNTC 79.Google Scholar

Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), ICJ Reports (2010), 135 (‘Pulp Mills case’), Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade.Google Scholar

Rajamani, L. (2016). Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretive Possibilities and Underlying Politics. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 65(2), 493–514.Google Scholar

Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) No 31 (21 May 2024) (‘ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Climate Change’).Google Scholar

Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s Judgement of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France), ICJ Reports (1995), 320 (‘Request for an Examination case’), Dissenting Opinion of Justice Weeramantry.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. & Sivakumarani, S. (2018). The Theory and Reality of The Sources of International Law. In Evans, M., ed., International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 89–118.Google Scholar

Sacchi et al Case, Decision adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure in respect of Communication No. 107/2019, UN Doc. CRC/C/88/D/107/2019. (UNCRC) (2021) (‘Sacchi case’).Google Scholar

Sands, P. (2016). Climate Change and the Rule of Law: Adjudicating the Future in International Law. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(1), 19–35.10.1093/jel/eqw005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sands, P. & Mackenzie, R. (2008). International Courts and Tribunals, Amicus Curiae. Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law. Available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e8.Google Scholar

Scholtz, W. (2021). Equity. In Rajamani, L. & Peel, J., eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–50.Google Scholar

Seneviratne, K. (2023). ‘Frustrated’ USP Law Students were Catalyst for Landmark UN Climate Vote. The University of the South Pacific (USP) (Web Page, 6 April 2023). Available at: www.usp.ac.fj/wansolwaranews/news/frustrated-usp-law-students-were-catalyst-for-landmark-un-climate-vote/.Google Scholar

Shams, A. (2023). Tempering Great Expectations: The Legitimacy Constraints and the Conflict Function of International Courts in International Climate Litigation. Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law, 32, 193–205.10.1111/reel.12510CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shelton, D. (2007). The International Court of Justice and Non-Government Organisations. International Community Law Review, 9, 139–55.10.1163/187197407X210247CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shrestha v. Office of the Prime Minister et al, NKP 2075 Supreme Court of Nepal (2018), 61(3), Decision No. 10210.Google Scholar

Stankovic, T., Hovi, J. & Skodvin, T. (2023). The Paris Agreement’s Inherent Tension between Ambition and Compliance. Humanities & Social Sciences Communication, 10, article 550. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02054-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

State of Himachal Pradesh and Others v Ganesh Wood Products and Others, Supreme Court of India (1996), A.I.R., Supreme Court 149.Google Scholar

Statute of the International Court of Justice (adopted 29 June 1945; entered into force 24 October 1945), XV UNCIO 355 (‘ICJ Statute’).Google Scholar

Stephens, T. (2020). See You in Court? A Rising Tide of International Climate Litigation. The Interpreter, Lowy Institute. Available at: www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/see-you-court-rising-tide-international-climate-litigation.Google Scholar

Streck, C. (2021). From Laggards to Leaders. In Barnes, R. & Long, R., eds., Frontiers in International Environmental Law: Oceans and Climate Challenges. Leiden: Brill, 75–105.10.1163/9789004372887_004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sudiep Shrivastava v Union of India, National Green Tribunal of India (2014), Appeal No. 73/2012 (2014).Google Scholar

Tams, C. (2005). Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511494116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tams, C. J. & Tzanakopoulos, A. (2010). Barcelona Traction at 40: The ICJ as an Agent of Legal Development. Leiden Journal of International Law, 23, 781–800.10.1017/S0922156510000361CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Pact for the Future, contained in UNGA resolution A/RES/79/1 (22 September 2024).Google Scholar

Tørstad, V. & Sælen, H. (2017). Fairness in the Climate Negotiations: What Explains Variation in Parties’ Expressed Conceptions? Climate Policy, 18(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1341372.Google Scholar

Tørstad, V. H. (2020). Participation, Ambition and Compliance: Can the Paris Agreement Solve the Effectiveness Trilemma? Environmental Politics, 5, 761–80.Google Scholar

UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2023). General Comment No. 26 on Children’s Rights and the Environment, with a Special Focus on Climate Change, 22 August 2023, UN Doc. CRC/C/G C/26, 2.Google Scholar

UN Department for General Assembly and Conference Management. (2021). Report of the International Law Commission. Seventy-second session. 26 April–4 June and 5 July–6 August 2021, General Assembly Official Records Seventy-sixth Session Supplement No. 10 (A/76/10) 31.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly (UNGA). (2006). Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. UN Doc. A/RES/61/36.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly (UNGA). (2018). Report of the ILC. 70th the session, 30 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2018, Report to the General Assembly, UN Doc. A/73/10.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly (UNGA). (2022). Modalities for the Summit of the Future, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, UN Doc. A/RES/76/307.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly (UNGA). (2023). Request for an Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change. Resolution of the General Assembly. UN Doc. A/RES/77/276.Google Scholar

United Nations. (2024). Summit of the Future, Our Common Agenda. Available at: www.un.org/en/summit-of-the-future/pact-for-the-future.Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (adopted 9 May 1992; entered into force 21 March 1994) 1771 UNTS 107.Google Scholar

Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334609.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verein Klimaseniorinnen v Switzerland, App no. 53600/20 European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) (9 April 2024).Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) (1969) (adopted 23 May 1969; entered into force on 27 January 1980) 1155 UNTS 331.Google Scholar

Voigt, C. (2023). The Power of the Paris Agreement in International Climate Litigation. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 32, 237–49.10.1111/reel.12514CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Youth Verdict Ltd & Ors (No. 6), Land Court of Queensland [2022] QLC 21.Google Scholar

Waweru v. Republic of Kenya, High Court of Kenya (2006) 1 KLR (E&L).Google Scholar

Wewerinke-Singh, M. & Hinge Salili, D. (2020). Between Negotiations and Litigation: Vanuatu’s Perspective on Loss and Damage from Climate Change. Climate Policy, 20(6), 681–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wewerinke-Singh, M., Aguon, J. & Hunter, J. (2021). Bringing Climate Change before the International Court of Justice: Prospects for Contentious Cases and Advisory Opinions. In Alogna, I., Bakker, C., & Gauci, J.P. eds., Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives. Leiden: Brill, 393–414.10.1163/9789004447615_018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wewerinke-Singh, M., Garg, A. & Agarwalla, S. (2023). In Defence of Future Generations: A Reply to Stephen Humphrey. European Journal of International Law, 20, 1–17.Google Scholar

Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening), ICJ Reports, (2014), 348, Separate Opinion of Judge Trindade.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2014). Does Fairness Matter in International Environmental Governance? Creating an Effective and Equitable Climate Regime. In Cherry, T. L., Hovi, J. & McEvoy, D. M., eds., Toward a New Climate Agreement: Conflict, Resolution and Governance. London: Taylor & Francis, 16–28.Google Scholar

Zahar, A. (2014). Mediated versus Cumulative Environmental Damage and the International Law Association’s Legal Principles on Climate Change. Climate Law, 4, 217–33.Google Scholar

Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) (15 November 2017).Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (2007). Legitimacy. In Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. & Hey, E., eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 704–26.Google Scholar

Boyd, D. R. & Knox, J. H. (2020). Before the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, C.S. et al v. Argentina, Brazil, France, Germany and Turkey: Amici Curiae Brief on Special Rapporteurs on Human Rights and the Environment in Support of Admissibility. United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the Environment and former UN Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment.Google Scholar

Burger, M., Wentz, J. & Horton, R. (2021). The Law and Science of Climate Change Attribution. 51 Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 10646. Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/sabin_climate_change/32.Google Scholar

Burgers, L. (2020). Should Judges Make Climate Change Law? Transnational Environmental Law, 9, 55–75.10.1017/S2047102519000360CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Child Rights Connect. (2022a). Mid Year OPIC Trends 2022 (June 2022). Available at: https://opic.childrightsconnect.org/read-about-opics-latest-trends-through-our-2022-mid-year-opic-trends-report/.Google Scholar

Child Rights Connect. (2022b). The Mechanisms, The Communications Procedure, OPIC, Optional Protocol on a Communications Procedure. Available at: https://opic.childrightsconnect.org/what-is-opic/the-mechanisms/.Google Scholar

Child Rights Connect. (2024). Ratification Status, OPIC, Optional Protocol on a Communications Procedure. Available at: https://opic.childrightsconnect.org/ratification-status/.Google Scholar

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (1989) (adopted 20 November 1989; entered into force 2 September 1990), 1577 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Donger, E. (2022). Children and Youth in Strategic Climate Litigation: Advancing Rights through Legal Argument and Legal Mobilization. Transnational Environmental Law, 11(2), 263–89.10.1017/S2047102522000218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 Others, App no. 39371/20 European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) (9 April 2024).Google Scholar

Earth System Governance Project. (2018). Earth System Governance. Science and Implementation Plan of The Earth System Governance Project. Utrecht: ESGP.Google Scholar

Fox Principi, K. (2017). United Nations Individual Complaint Procedures – How Do States Comply? Human Rights Law Journal, 37, 1–31.Google Scholar

Gellers, J. C. (2021). Earth System Law and the Legal Status of Non-Humans in the Anthropocene. Earth System Government, 7, 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilabert, P. & Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration. Political Studies, 60, 809–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x.Google Scholar

Gubbay, I. & Wenzler, C. (2021). Intergenerational Climate Change Litigation: The First Climate Communication to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. In Alogna, I., Bakker, C. & Gauci, J.-P., eds., Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives. Leiden: Brill, 343–65. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004447615_016.Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Summary for Policy Makers. In AR6 Synthesis Report. Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC, 1–34.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J. (2019). Earth System Law for the Anthropocene. Sustainability, 11(23), 6796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236796.Google Scholar

Limon, M. (2018). Reform of the UN Human Rights Petitions System. Geneva: Universal Rights Group.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, M. K. (2016). Institutional Design and Sources of Short-Termism. In González-Ricoy, I. & Gosseries, A., eds., Institutions for Future Generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746959.003.0002.Google Scholar

Nolan, A. (2023). General Comment No. 26 on Children and the Environment – A Milestone in International Human Rights Law? European Journal of International Law: Talk! (Blog, 11 September 2023). Available at: www.ejiltalk.org/general-comment-no-26-on-children-and-the-environment-a-milestone-in-international-human-rights-law/.Google Scholar

Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure (adopted 19 December 2011; entered into force 14 April 2014) 2983 UNTS 135. Contained in a resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly, UN Doc. A/RES/66/138. (‘Third Optional Protocol’.)Google Scholar

Peel, J. & Osofsky, H. M. (2018). A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 7, 37–67.10.1017/S2047102517000292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, N. (2019). Law, Fiction and Activism in a Time of Climate Change, Abingdon/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429465406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, N. (2020). Victim, Litigant, Activist, Messiah: The Child in a Time of Climate Change. In Richardson, B. J., ed., From Student Strikes to the Extinction Rebellion. New Protest Movements Shaping our Future. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 103–21.Google Scholar

Sacchi, C. et al. (2020). Petitioners’ Reply to Admissibility Objections of Brazil, France, and Germany, in Sacchi et al v Argentina, Brazil, France, Germany and Turkey (4 May 2020).Google Scholar

Sacchi, C., Lorenzo, C., Ivanova, R., Ackley, D., Anjain, R., Kabua, L., Islands, M., Adegbile, D., Manuel, C., Melithafa, A., Thunberg, G., Smith, C., Villaseñor, A., (Sacchi et al. decision) (2019). Communication to the Committee on the Rights of the Child, in Sacchi et al v. Argentina, Brazil, France, Germany and Turkey (23 September 2019).Google Scholar

Setzer, J. & Byrnes, R. (2019). Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2019 Snapshot. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. London: Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy.Google Scholar

Steinert, C. V. (2024). Elitist Remedies? Complaint Resources and Representation in International Human Rights Bodies. International Studies Quarterly, 68, 1–16.10.1093/isq/sqae042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The State of the Netherlands (Ministry for Infrastructure and the Environment) v Urgenda Foundation, Decision of the Hague Court of Appeal, Case no. ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2018:2610 (in Dutch) 200.178.245/01 (English translation) (9 October 2018).Google Scholar

The State of the Netherlands (Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy) v Urgenda Foundation, Decision of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, Case no. ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2006 (in Dutch) 19/00135 (English translation) (20 December 2019).Google Scholar

United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2021a). Decision adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure in respect of Communication No. 107/2019, UN Doc. CRC/C/88/D/107/2019.Google Scholar

United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2021b). Decision adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure in Respect of Communication No. 108/2019, UN Doc. CRC/C/88/D/108/2019.Google Scholar

United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2021c). Decision adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure in Respect of Communication No. 106/2019, UN Doc. CRC/C/88/D/106/2019.Google Scholar

United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2021d). Decision adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure in Respect of Communication No. 104/2019, UN Doc. CRC/C/88/D/104/2019.Google Scholar

United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2021e). Decision adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure in Respect of Communication No. 105/2019, UN Doc. CRC/C/88/D/105/2019.Google Scholar

United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2023). General Comment no. 26 (2023) on Children’s Rights and the Environment, with a Special Focus on Climate Change, UN Doc. CRC/C/G C/26 (22 August 2023).Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1992) (adopted 9 May 1992; entered into force 21 March 1994), 1771 UNTS 107.Google Scholar

United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2021a). The Human Right to a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council. UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/48/13.Google Scholar

United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2021b). Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in the Context of Climate Change. Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council, UN Doc. A/HRC/48/L.27.Google Scholar

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR). (2024). Membership, Committee on the Rights of the Child. Available at: www.ohchr.org/en/treaty-bodies/crc/membership.Google Scholar

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR). (2019). Statement on Human Rights and Climate Change (9 September 2019). Joint statement by five UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies, UN Doc. HRI/2019/1. Available at: www.ohchr.org/en/statements-and-speeches/2019/09/five-un-human-rights-treaty-bodies-issue-joint-statement-human.Google Scholar

United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the Environment. (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment, Annual Report to the UN General Assembly, UN Doc. No. A/74/161. UN General Assembly.Google Scholar

Verein Klimaseniorinnen v Switzerland, App no. 53600/20 European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) (9 April 2024).Google Scholar

Winter, C. J. (2022). Subjects of Intergenerational Justice, Abington/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ball, T. T. (2006). Democracy. In Dobson, A. & Eckersely, R., eds., Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131–47.Google Scholar

Beckman, L. & Uggla, F. (2016). An Ombudsman for Future Generations, Legitimate and Effective? In González-Ricoy, I. & Gosseries, A., eds., Institutions for Future Generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 117–34.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (1999). The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law? American Journal of International Law, 93(3), 596–624.Google Scholar

Boston, J. (2017). Governing for the Future: Designing Democratic Institutions for a Better Tomorrow, Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar

Boston, J. (2021a). Protecting Long-term Interests: The Role of Institutions as Commitment Devices. In Linehan, J. & Lawrence, P., eds., Giving Future Generations A Voice, Normative Frameworks, Institutions and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 86–107.Google Scholar

Boston, J. (2021b). Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, New Zealand. In Cordonier Segger, M.C., Szabó, M. & Harrington, A. R., eds., Intergenerational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation: Advancing Future Generations Rights through National Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 434–60.Google Scholar

Boston, J., Bagnall, D. & Barry, A. (2019). Foresight, Insight and Oversight, Enhancing Long-Term Governance through Better Parliamentary Scrutiny, Victoria University, Wellington: Institute for Governance and Policy Studies.Google Scholar

Caney, S. (2010). Climate Change, Human Rights and Moral Thresholds. In Humphreys, S. ed., Human Rights and Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; reprinted in Gardiner, S. et al., eds., Climate Ethics Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 163–77.Google Scholar

Coalition for the UN We Need (C4UN). (2023). Interim Peoples Pact for the Future: 2023 Civil Society Perspectives on the Summit of the Future. Available at: https://c4unwn.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Interim-Peoples-Pact-for-the-Future-Compressed.pdf.Google Scholar

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (1989) (adopted 20 November 1989; entered into force 2 September 1990), 1577 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Day, R. (2024). Coming Soon A UN Envoy for Future Generations, United Nations University (October 9, 2024). Available at: https://unu.edu/cpr/blog-post/coming-soon-un-envoy-future-generations.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Its Democratic Legitimacy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingwerth, K. (2014). Global Democracy and the Democratic Minimum: Why a Procedural Account Alone Is Insufficient. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 1124–47.10.1177/1354066113509116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donger, E. (2022). Children and Youth in Strategic Climate Litigation: Advancing Rights through Legal Argument and Legal Mobilization. Transnational Environmental Law, 1(2), 263–89.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. & Pickering, J. (2018). The Politics of the Anthropocene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Ricoy, I. & Rey, F. (2019). Enfranchising the Future: Climate Justice and the Representation of Future Generations. WIREs Climate Change, 10(4), e598. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (1996). Enfranchising the Earth, and Its Alternatives. Political Studies, 44(5), 835–49.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (2007). Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35(1), 40–68.Google Scholar

Group of 77 and China. (2022). Statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China by Mr Muhammad Imran Khan, Counsellor, Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations, At the informal consultations on the draft elements paper on the ‘Declaration for Future Generations’ (New York, 7 September 2022). Available at: www.g77.org/statement/getstatement.php?id=220907.Google Scholar

Hale, T. N. (2008). Transparency, Accountability, and Global Governance. Global Governance, 14(1), 73–94.Google Scholar

Hale, T., Moorhouse, F., Ord, T. & Slaughter, A. (2023). Towards a Declaration on Future Generations, Blavatnik School of Government, Policy Brief.Google Scholar

Harte, M. J. (1995). Ecology, Sustainability, and Environmental Capital. Ecological Economics, 15(2), 157–64.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, A. (2010). Children’s Rights in International Politics, The Transformative Power of Discourse, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Issues Paper on the Intergovernmental Process for the Declaration on Future Generations prepared by the Co-facilitators (Issues Paper 2023), 27 June 2023. Available at: www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sof-dfg_-_issues_paper.pdf.Google Scholar

Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. and Vihma, A. (2009). Comparing the Legitimacy and Effectiveness of Global Hard and Soft Law: An Analytical Framework. Regulation & Governance, 3(4), 400–20.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. (2014). Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9780857934161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, P. (2019). Representation of Future Generations. In Kalfagianni, A., Fuchs, D. & Hayden, A., eds., Routledge Handbook of Global Sustainability Governance. London: Routledge, 88–99.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. (2021). International Institutions for Future Generations and Democratic Legitimacy. In Cordonier Segger, M. C., Szabó, M. & Harrington, A. R., eds., Intergenerational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation: Advancing Future Generations Rights through National Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 597–614.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. (2022). Justifying Representation of Future Generations and Nature: Contradictory or Mutually Supporting Values? Transnational Environmental Law, 11(3), 1–27.10.1017/S2047102522000176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, P. & Köhler, L. (2018). Representation of Future Generations through International Climate Litigation: A Normative Framework. German Yearbook of International Law, 60(1), 639–66.Google Scholar

Mary Robinson Foundation Climate Justice. (2015). Meeting the needs of Future Generations: Applying the Principle of Intergenerational Equity to the 2015 Processes on Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Available at: www.mrfcj.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/MRFCJPositionPaper_MeetingtheNeedsofFutureGenerations_12August2015.pdf.Google Scholar

Mary Robinson Foundation Climate Justice. (2018). Global Guardians: A Voice for Future Generations, Policy Brief. Available at: www.mrfcj.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Global-Guardians-A-Voice-for-Future-Generations-Position-Paper-2018.pdf.Google Scholar

Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Niemeyer, S. & Jennstål, J. (2017). The Deliberative Democratic Inclusion of Future Generations. In González-Ricoy, I. & Gosseries, A., eds., Institutions for Future Generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–65.Google Scholar

Ott, K. (2017). Sustainability: Theory and policy. In Klauer, B., Manstetten, R., Petersen, T. & Schiller, J., eds., Sustainability and the Art of Long-Term Thinking. London: Routledge, 16–30.Google Scholar

Paris Agreement (2015) (adopted 12 December 2015; entered into force 4 November 2016), 3156 UNTC 79.Google Scholar

Pitkin, H. (1967). The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Rajamani, L. (2006). Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280704.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saward, M. (2008). Representation and Democracy: Revisions and Possibilities. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 1000–13.Google Scholar

Soltau, F. (2021). The 2030 Agenda the Sustainable Development: What are its Implications for Future Generations? In Linehan, J. & Lawrence, P., eds., Giving Future Generations a Voice: Normative Frameworks, Institutions and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 108–27.Google Scholar

Spijkers, O. (2018). Intergenerational Equity and the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 10, 1–12.Google Scholar

The Pact for the Future, contained in UNGA resolution A/RES/79/1 (22 September 2024).Google Scholar

United Nations. (2023). Issues Paper on the Intergovernmental Process for the Declaration on Future Generations, Prepared by the Co-facilitators, 27 June 2023. Available at: www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sof-dfg_-_issues_paper.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations. (2024). Summit of the Future, Our Common Agenda. Available at: www.un.org/en/summit-of-the-future/pact-for-the-future.Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1992) (adopted 9 May 1992; entered into force 21 March 1994), 1771 UNTS 107.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UN Doc. A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2022a). Modalities for the Summit of the Future. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, UN Doc. A/RES/76/307.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2022b). The Human Right to a Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, UN Doc. A/76/L.75.Google Scholar

United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner (UNOHCHR). (2021). General Comment No. 26 on Children’s Rights and the Environment with a Special Focus on Climate Change. Available at: www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/draft-general-comment-no-26-childrens-rights-and.Google Scholar

United Nations Secretary-General (UNSG). (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, UN Doc. A/42/427.Google Scholar

United Nations Secretary-General (UNSG). (2013). Intergenerational Solidarity and the Needs of Future Generations: Report of the Secretary-General, UN Doc. A/68/322.Google Scholar

United Nations Secretary-General (UNSG). (2021). Our Common Agenda.Google Scholar

United Nations Secretary-General (UNSG). (2022). Press Release, UN Doc. SG/SM/21399.Google Scholar

United Nations Secretary-General (UNSG). (2023). Our Common Agenda Policy Brief 1, To Think and Act for Future Generations.Google Scholar

Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Atmospheric Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334609.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, H. (2012). Committing to the Future We Want: A High Commissioner for Future Generations at Rio+20, Foundation for Democracy and Sustainable Development, World Future Council. Available at: www.fdsd.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Committing-to-the-future-we-want-main-report.pdf.Google Scholar

Wendt, A. (2001). Driving with a Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design. International Organization, 55(4), 1019–49.Google Scholar

Angstadt, M. & Betsill, M. (2021). Non-state Actors. In Rajamani, L. & Peel, J., eds., Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 666–83.Google Scholar

Beck, S. & Mahony, M. (2018). The IPCC and the New Map of Science and Politics. WIREs Climate Change, 9(6), e547. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biermann, F. (2007). ‘Earth System Governance’ as a Crosscutting Theme of Global Change Research. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 326–37.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biermann, F. et al. (2019). The Earth System Governance Project as a Network Organization: A Critical Assessment after Ten Years. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 17–23.Google Scholar

Boston, J. (2016). Governing for the Future: Designing Democratic Institutions for a Better Tomorrow, Bingley: Emerald.10.1108/S2053-7697201725CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brundtland, G. (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Comim, F. (2008). Climate Injustice and Development: A Capability Perspective. Development, 51, 344–49.10.1057/dev.2008.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood, The Report of the Commission on Global Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Earth System Governance. Research Agenda and Science Plan, ESG (2024). Available at: www.earthsystemgovernance.org/research-agenda-science-plan/.Google Scholar

Kowarsch, M. & Edenhofer, O. (2015). Cartography of Pathways: A New Model for Environmental Policy Assessments. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 56–64.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. (2022). Justifying Representation of Future Generations and Nature: Contradictory or Mutually Supporting Values? Transnational Environmental Law, 11(3), 1–27.10.1017/S2047102522000176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Messner, D. (2000). Globalisierung und Global Governance – Entwicklungstrends am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts. In Siegelberg, J., & Schlichte, K., eds., Strukturwandel internationaler Beziehungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Reder, M. (2009). Globalisierung und Philosophie. Eine Einführung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shue, H. (1993). Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions. Law and Policy, 15(1), 39–60.10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00093.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wewerinke-Singh, A., Garg, M. & Agarwalla, S. (2023). In Defence of Future Generations: A Reply to Stephen Humphreys. European Journal of International Law, 34(3), 651–68.10.1093/ejil/chad033CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, M. (2018). A Theory of Global Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar