Endovascular Technology: Exploitation of Endovascular Corridors in the Broad Catalog of Challenges

doi:10.1017/9781009597852.026

Chapter 16 - Endovascular Technology: Exploitation of Endovascular Corridors in the Broad Catalog of Challenges

from Section IV - The Surgeon’s Armamentarium

Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN

Jennifer E. Kim ,

Joshua S. Catapano ,

Badih Daou ,

Ashutosh P. Jadhav ,

Andrew Ducruet and

Felipe C. Albuquerque

Edited by

Benjamin Hartley ,

Philip E. Stieg ,

Rohan Ramakrishna and

Michael L. J. Apuzzo

Show author details

Benjamin Hartley: Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical Center
Philip E. Stieg: Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College
Rohan Ramakrishna: Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College
Michael L. J. Apuzzo: Affiliation:
Adjunct of Yale Medical School and Weill Cornell Medical College

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Advancements in the field of endovascular neurosurgery have resulted in unprecedented shifts in treatment paradigms and practice patterns. Novel implantable devices, improved catheter constructions, and new insights into disease pathomechanisms have encouraged providers to expand the indications for endovascular interventions and offer new treatment options for lesions that were previously thought to be inoperable or surgically high-risk. These include flow modifying devices for the treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, as well as super-selective embolizations and infusions for the treatment of numerous cerebrovascular and oncologic diseases. The existing evidence for the safety and efficacy of these therapies is encouraging, however, continued evaluation with rigorous, prospective trials is warranted to better understand their durability and long-term benefits.

Keywords

endovascular neurosurgery neurointerventional radiology flow diverter flow disruptor middle meningeal artery embolization intra-arterial therapy

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Neurosurgery
Beyond the Cutting Edge
, pp. 351 - 362

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009597852.026 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Antunes, JL. Egas Moniz and cerebral angiography. J Neurosurg 1974;40[4]:427–32.10.3171/jns.1974.40.4.0427CrossRef Google Scholar

Luessenhop, AJ, Velasquez, AC. Observations on the tolerance of the intracranial arteries to catheterization. J Neurosurg 1964;21:85–91.10.3171/jns.1964.21.2.0085CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Serbinenko, FA. Balloon catheterization and occlusion of major cerebral vessels. J Neurosurg 1974;41[2]:125–45.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Guglielmi, G, Viñuela, F, Sepetka, I, Macellari, V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg 1991;75[1].Google Scholar PubMed

Molyneux, A, Kerr, R, Stratton, I, Sandercock, P, Clarke, M, Shrimpton, J, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial [ISAT] of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360[9342]:1267–74.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lindgren, A, Vergouwen, MD, Schaaf, Ivd, Algra, A, Wermer, M, Clarke, MJ, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochr Database Syst Rev 2018[8]:CD003085.10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub3CrossRef Google Scholar

Spetzler, RF, McDougall, CG, Zabramski, JM, Albuquerque, FC, Hills, NK, Russin, JJ, et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results. J Neurosurg 2015;123[3]:609–17.10.3171/2014.9.JNS141749CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McDougall, CG, Spetzler, RF, Zabramski, JM, Partovi, S, Hills, NK, Nakaji, P, et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116[1]:135–44.10.3171/2011.8.JNS101767CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pontes, FGdB, Silva, EMd, Baptista-Silva, JC, Vasconcelos, V. Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Cochr Database Syst Rev 2021[5]:CD013312.10.1002/14651858.CD013312.pub2CrossRef Google Scholar

Rizvi, A, Seyedsaadat, SM, Alzuabi, M, Murad, MH, Kadirvel, R, Brinjikji, W, et al. Long-term rupture risk in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41[6]:1043–8.10.3174/ajnr.A6568CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gareev, I, Beylerli, O, Sufianov, A, Taussky, P. Editorial: Recent advances in vascular neurosurgery. Front Surg 2023;10:1159237.10.3389/fsurg.2023.1159237CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Elsenousi, A, Aletich, VA, Alaraj, A. Neurological outcomes and cure rates of embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations with n-butyl cyanoacrylate or Onyx: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8[3]:265–72.10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011427CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gross, BA, Albuquerque, FC, Moon, K, McDougall, CG. Evolution of treatment and a detailed analysis of occlusion, recurrence, and clinical outcomes in an endovascular library of 260 dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 2017;126[6]:1884–93.Google Scholar

Roaldsen, MB, Jusufovic, M, Berge^a, E, Lindekleiv, H. Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochr Database Syst Rev 2021[6]:CD007574.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ironside, N, Nguyen, C, Do, Q, Ugiliweneza, B, Chen, C, Sieg, EP, et al. Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13[10]:951–7.10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017352CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ahmed, RM, Wilkinson, M, Parker, GD, Thurtell, MJ, Macdonald, J, McCluskey, PJ, et al. Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32[8]:1408–14.10.3174/ajnr.A2575CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lylyk, P, Lylyk, I, Bleise, C, Scrivano, E, Lylyk, PN, Beneduce, B, et al. First-in-human endovascular treatment of hydrocephalus with a miniature biomimetic transdural shunt. J NeuroInterv Surg 2022;14[5]:495–9.10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018136CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dandapat, S, Mendez-Ruiz, A, Martínez-Galdámez, M, Macho, J, Derakhshani, S, Foa Torres, G, et al. Review of current intracranial aneurysm flow diversion technology and clinical use. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13[1]:54–62.10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015877CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Becske, T, Kallmes, DF, Saatci, I, McDougall, CG, Szikora, I, Lanzino, G, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267[3]:858–68.10.1148/radiol.13120099CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Oliver, AA, Carlson, KD, Bilgin, C, Arturo Larco, JL, Kadirvel, R, Guillory, RJ, et al. Bioresorbable flow diverters for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: review of current literature and future directions. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15[2]:178–82.10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018941CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cancelliere, NM, Lynch, J, Nicholson, P, Dobrocky, T, Swaminathan, SK, Hendriks, EJ, et al. Robotic-assisted intracranial aneurysm treatment: 1 year follow-up imaging and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14[12]:1229–33.10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017865CrossRef Google Scholar

Hecker, C, Broussalis, E, Griessenauer, CJ, Killer-Oberpfalzer, M. A mini-review of intrasaccular flow diverters. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15[1]:70–4.10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018426CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arthur, AS, Molyneux, A, Coon, AL, Saatci, I, Szikora, I, Baltacioglu, F, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge [WEB] system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy [WEB-IT] Study. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11[9]:924–30.10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815CrossRef Google Scholar

Monteiro, A, Lazar, AL, Waqas, M, Rai, HH, Baig, AA, Cortez, GM, et al. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: a systematic review. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14[4]:366–70.10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017613CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Liebig, T, Killer-Oberpfalzer, M, Gal, G, Schramm, P, Berlis, A, Dorn, F, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System [Contour] for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms: the CERUS study. Neurosurgery 2022;90[3]:270–7.10.1227/NEU.0000000000001783CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kolias, AG, Chari, A, Santarius, T, Hutchinson, PJ. Chronic subdural haematoma: modern management and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol 2014;10[10]:570–8.10.1038/nrneurol.2014.163CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cofano, F, Pesce, A, Vercelli, G, Mammi, M, Massara, A, Minardi, M, et al. Risk of recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas after surgery: a multicenter observational cohort study. Front Neurol 2020;11:560269.10.3389/fneur.2020.560269CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Edlmann, E, Giorgi-Coll, S, Whitfield, PC, Carpenter, KLH, Hutchinson, PJ. Pathophysiology of chronic subdural haematoma: inflammation, angiogenesis and implications for pharmacotherapy. J Neuroinflammation 2017;14:108.10.1186/s12974-017-0881-yCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sattari, SA, Yang, W, Shahbandi, A, Feghali, J, Lee, RP, Xu, R, et al. Middle meningeal artery embolization versus conventional management for patients with chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2023;92[6]:1142–54.10.1227/neu.0000000000002365CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Catapano, JS, Nguyen, CL, Wakim, AA, Albuquerque, FC, Ducruet, AF. Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma. Front Neurol 2020;11:557233.10.3389/fneur.2020.557233CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Qureshi, AI, Qureshi, MH, Khan, AA, Suri, MFK. Effect of intra-arterial injection of lidocaine and methyl-prednisolone into middle meningeal artery on intractable headaches. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2014;7[5]:69–72.Google Scholar PubMed

Fiorella, D, Arthur, AS, Yuan, H, Bhogal, P, Goyal, N, Khattar, NK, et al. Refractory migraine: a cerebrovascular disease? J Neurointerv Surg 2023:jnis-021148.10.1136/jnis-2023-021148CrossRef Google Scholar

Catapano, JS, Karahalios, K, Srinivasan, VM, Baranoski, JF, Rutledge, C, Cole, TS, et al. Chronic headaches and middle meningeal artery embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14[3]:301–3.Google Scholar PubMed

Mott, B, Iyer, A, Smith, E, Fargen, K, Brown, P, Wolfe, S. Current indications for intraarterial chemotherapy in neurointerventional surgery. Stroke: Vasc Interv Neurol 2022;3[2]:e000425.Google Scholar

Wen, X, Fan, J, Jin, M, Jiang, H, Li, J, Han, M, et al. Intravenous versus super-selected intra-arterial chemotherapy in children with advanced unilateral retinoblastoma: an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2023;7[9]:613–20.10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00141-4CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pinkiewicz, M, Pinkiewicz, M, Walecki, J, Zawadzki, M. A systematic review on intra-arterial cerebral infusions of chemotherapeutics in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme: the state-of-the-art. Front Oncol 2022;12:950167.10.3389/fonc.2022.950167CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fargen, KM, Soriano-Baron, HE, Rushing, JT, Mack, W, Mocco, J, Albuquerque, F, et al. A survey of intracranial aneurysm treatment practices among United States physicians. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10[1]:44–9.10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012808CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.